Private Investors: Doomed Forex Trading?

Private Investors: Doomed Forex Trading?

Small clients with deposits of a few hundred dollars and 1:1000 leverage are those who at all times are the first to lose money, thus enriching intermediaries such as forex brokers. has carried out a detailed analysis of the currency market and found out why this happens.

Peter Hill is an experienced forex trader, he gambles on the forex market for seven years already; he manages not only his own investment portfolio, but also the money of other private investors amounting up to $50,000. Over the years of online trading Peter has formulated the basic rule: trader’s profit is what he locks in profits and withdraws from his trading account and not the trader’s own money on a trading account which in fact is on the balance of the forex broker. “I constantly take profits and withdraw earnings to the bank deposits”, says Peter. He trades with several brokers including FXCM and FxPro. Maximum profit that Peter ever gained was 230% back in 2011. Peter believes that 35-50% profit per annum is a good and achievable rate. He says the main problem is the traders’ urge to earn a king’s ransom at a low level of investment.

He says the main problem is the traders’ urge to earn a king’s ransom at a low level of investment…

Classifying all market participants we can distinguish two categories of traders. The first one encloses large investors, banks and investment companies; the second category features small- and medium-sized clients with deposits from a few hundred dollars to $20,000 and a leverage of 1:1000. It is the second category of traders that is at the greatest risk. Based on the data provided by, over 70% of clients with leverage of 1:500 and above lose 100% of their deposit in the first month of trading, which means nothing else, but enriching brokers and other intermediaries.

Based on the data provided by, over 70% of clients with leverage of 1:500 and above lose 100% of their deposit in the first month of trading…

The main difference of the forex market compared to the stock market is its OTC nature. Forex market has no overall stock with identical quotes for all participants; exchange rates for different clients may be different at the same moment. Much depends on the trader’s size and status. This market is not homogeneous in its structure: the top level of the hierarchy includes global players, such as banks or investment companies. They make deals with each other using quasi stock markets, that is, the interbank and interdealer platforms.

Major interbank platforms are: Velocity by Citibank, Onyx by Credit Suisse, Cortex by BNP Paribas, Autobahn by Deutsche Bank, LMAX by InterBank. These trading systems have transparent pricing, same like on the exchange, where everyone plays against everyone. At that, as distinct from the stock market, on the forex market the dealer usually shows the client a quotation which already contains the dealer’s commission (we do not consider ECN here). Brokers earn on spread, that is, the difference between buy and sell price. A quotation the client will see depends on the amount of the transaction and the client’s status. Interdealer platforms provide different quotes to different clients. As a result big players get a better price than regular traders, partly because the platform does not gamble with currency and acts on the market with other purposes, such as to convert profits.

The quotes a client will see depend on the amount of the transaction and the client’s status.

Since in many countries forex market lacks transparency and regulation, it is quite common in such jurisdictions that brokers play against their own clients. Brokers can make reverse deals and hedge their positions. Profit of the brokers closing risks to themselves is formed mostly by losses of the deposits of the brokers’ own clients.

 In case of a trader’s win when the broker does not have enough capital to provide coverage of this amount, a conflict of interest emerges.

In many countries and at many regulators currently there are no requirements to the funds of the forex brokers. In most cases forex brokers claim that they lead their clients to the foreign exchange market, world’s largest in volume. However, experts believe that forex brokers have software enabling distinction between the orders of the professional traders and newbies.  The orders of the newbies never get to the market. The broker monitors not only the direction of the position, but also the amount of money in the client’s account, and the on which stop orders are placed.

For a short period of time the broker can purposefully make a change and trigger a stop loss, thus getting profit from the trader’s loss.

Another common fraud type is slippage. In the moments of severe market volatility freezing of trading platforms or failure of pending order execution may occur. It happens at times that technical problems are not a result of some software malfunction, but some broker’s activity instigated by an intention not to let the trader take profits. In fact the client is not being brought to the open market; all trade is done within the trading system, often on spurious quotations.

In companies of this type loss of the entire deposit is just a matter of time. According to, by the end of 2014 the percent of unscrupulous brokers amounted to at least 10% of the total number of market participants.

However, most brokers still faithfully perform their duties.

Then what’s the reason of the regular losses the traders bear?

Most experts agree that “the root of all evil” is a huge leverage offered by the vast majority of forex brokers. Leverage is a financial instrument, which allows traders to open positions which by times exceed the sum of the security deposit.

If someone is trading with 1:1000 leverage (which has become common for brokers), this means a $1,000 deposit allows him opening a position for $1,000,000. Rate change, e.g. USD/EUR from 1,325 to 1,324, results in a complete loss of the deposit. Fluctuations like this occur regularly within the trading day, and they are enough to lose the entire deposit within a few seconds.

Peter Hill says trading with such leverage is suicidal or casino-like, but it is not really forex trading. He personally rarely goes higher than 1:50 and recommends all traders not to go beyond oа 1:100 leverage.

Related Columns

The Worlds three Most Successful Forex Traders Ever

Whether you are new to trading Forex or an old hand at the currency markets, you are likely to share one key aspiration. One way to improve is to learn by example and to look at some of the most successful Forex traders in the world. In this article, you will learn about what the top Forex traders in the world have in common and how those strengths helped them to make huge profits. While you may have read about the statistics thrown around; suggesting that the ratio of successful Forex traders to unsuccessful ones is small. There are at least a couple of reasons...

The Pound Tumbles in delayed reaction

The Pound Tumbles in Delayed Reaction, as May gets Green Light from Parliament to Trigger Article 50. This has, so far, been a mixed week of good and bad news for Theresa May. The good news was that on Monday of this week she received the green light from parliament to trigger Article 50. The bad news was, however, very bad news indeed, after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon signalled the start of a legal process for an independence referendum. This quickly resulted in the pound tumbling against all of its Group-of-10 peer currencies...

Forex Awards live updates from iFX EXPO Asia 2017

Here today at iFX EXPO Asia 2017, taking place in Hong Kong, FX industry experts are gathered to answer burning questions. How to market electronic brokerage and succeed in China? What are the hottest trends in todays Forex trading when it comes to technology? How to deal with new regulatory demands imposed on forex brokers? What new opportunities does MetaTrader 5 give to FX business operation? These and many other hottest issues are now being discussed by forex industry professionals at the Hong Kong Exhibition...

Will 2017 be the Beginning of the End of the EU?

The UK is not going to leave the European Union. Of course, not. We are inextricably wound up with Europe. In terms of culture, history and geography, we are a European nation. Nick Clegg, British Liberal Democrat politician - 2010 to 2015 in the David Cameron coalition ministry. A special report on the current state of the EU and what could be in store, for the EU in 2017 - post Brexit and Trump and the rise of the EU populist movements, by Victor Romain, for Invest Ratings....

A Roundup of the Main Business News Headlines of 2016

Our moral economy went bankrupt long before our financial one. - Steve Maraboli, Unapologetically You: Reflections on Life and the Human Experience. A lot of crazy things have happened this year and I believe that I could be right in saying that many years down the road from now - many people are going to be talking about 2016. The history books will surely be looking back at 2016 in awe. This year also saw in some of the most surprising and, at the same time disruptive and seismic changes in the world of politics...

Warren Buffet backs low cost funds

EFTS - Exchange Traded Funds are quickly becoming the darlings of the financial world and are, in fact, even coming to dominate it. What used to be a relatively niche sector, is now rapidly becoming one of the biggest games in town - they now even have Warren Buffet blessing and seal of approval. Trading in Apple shares is worth over 3 billion pounds a day. However, that pales into insignificance with the 14 billion pounds, which is traded daily in the shares of State Street SPDR 500 fund. Today, the buying and selling of ETF accounts for almost 90%...